Reduced-impact logging : Challenges and opportunities

Putz Francis E., Sist Plinio, Fredericksen D., Dykstra Dennis P.. 2008. Reduced-impact logging : Challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management, 256 (7) : pp. 1427-1433.

Journal article ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact
[img] Published version - Anglais
Access restricted to CIRAD agents
Use under authorization by the author or CIRAD.

Télécharger (168kB)

Abstract : Over the past two decades, sets of timber harvesting guidelines designed to mitigate the deleterious environmental impacts of tree felling, yarding, and hauling have become known as ''reduced-impact logging'' (RIL) techniques. Although none of the components of RIL are new, concerns about destructive logging practices and worker safety in the tropics stimulated this recent proliferation of semicoordinated research and training activities related to timber harvesting. Studies in Southeast Asia, Africa, and South and Central America have clearly documented that the undesired impacts of selective logging on residual stands and soils can be substantially reduced through implementation of a series of recommended logging practices by crews that are appropriately trained, supervised, and compensated. Whether reducing the deleterious impacts of logging also reduces profits seems to depend on site conditions (e.g., terrain, soil trafficability, and riparian areas), whether the profits from illegal activities are included in the baseline, and the perspective from which the economic calculations are made. A standardized approach for calculating logging costs using RILSIM software is advocated to facilitate comparisons and to allow uncoupling RIL practices to evaluate their individual financial costs and benefits. Further complicating the matter is that while there are elements common to all RIL guidelines (e.g., directional felling), other components vary (e.g., slope limits of 17-408 with ground-based yarding). While use of RIL techniques may be considered as a prerequisite for sustaining timber yields (STY), in particular, and sustainable forest management (SFM), in general, RIL should not be confounded with STY and SFM. This confusion is particularly problematic in forests managed for light-demanding species that benefit from both canopy opening and mineral soil exposure as well as where harvesting intensities are high and controlled primarily by minimum diameter cutting limits. These qualifications notwithstanding, since logging is the most intensive of silvicultural treatments in most tropical forests managed for timber, some aspects of RIL are critical (e.g., protection of water courses) whether forests aremanaged for STY, SFM, or even replacement by agricultural crops. (Résumé d'auteur)

Mots-clés Agrovoc : forêt tropicale, Abattage d'arbres, Aménagement forestier, Impact sur l'environnement, Analyse des coûts, Exploitation forestière, Développement durable

Classification Agris : E16 - Production economics
K10 - Forestry production
P01 - Nature conservation and land resources

Champ stratégique Cirad : Axe 6 (2005-2013) - Agriculture, environnement, nature et sociétés

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Putz Francis E., University of Florida (USA)
  • Sist Plinio, CIRAD-ES-UPR Dynamique forestière (BRA)
  • Fredericksen D., School of Natural Sciences and Mathematics (USA)
  • Dykstra Dennis P., USDA (USA)

Autres liens de la publication

Source : Cirad - Agritrop (

View Item (staff only) View Item (staff only)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2021-03-07 ]