Dealing with power games in a companion modelling process: Lessons from community water management in Thailand highlands

Barnaud Cécile, Van Paassen Annemarie, Trébuil Guy, Promburom Tanya, Bousquet François. 2010. Dealing with power games in a companion modelling process: Lessons from community water management in Thailand highlands. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 16 (1) : pp. 55-74.

Journal article ; Article de revue à comité de lecture
[img] Published version - Anglais
Access restricted to CIRAD agents
Use under authorization by the author or CIRAD.

Télécharger (259kB)

Liste HCERES des revues (en SHS) : oui

Thème(s) HCERES des revues (en SHS) : Economie-gestion; Sciences de l'éducation

Abstract : Although stakeholder participation is expected to promote equitable and sustainable natural resource management, lessons from the past tell us that more careful attention needs to be paid to achieving equitable impacts. Now the question is how to address social inequities and power asymmetries. Some authors emphasize the need for more dialogue, while others prefer a critical perspective, arguing that dialogue might not be sufficient to avert the risk of a process deepening existing social inequities. This article aims to enrich this debate and question the practical implications of the critical perspective through an in-depth analysis of power games in a participatory process. A Companion Modelling (ComMod) process was conducted in an Akha community of Northern Thailand with a critical perspective, i.e. with a concern for the less influent stakeholders. Simulation tools such as role-playing games were used to mediate a cross-cultural learning process among researchers, farmers and administrators about a local irrigation water management problem. The detailed analysis of power games in this learning and negotiation process reveals that in spite of initial power asymmetries, the poorest farmers of the community started to voice and assert their interests. This was very much due to the role of a Western researcher who put the equity issue on the public agenda and to the strategic support of a charismatic Christian leader. We identify a set of practical facilitation methods that helped to manage power asymmetries and to level the playing field, but we also discuss the main limits of our cultural-embedded methodological choices. Acknowledging that 'the facilitators' neutrality' is an illusion, this study allows us to raise the question of their social legitimacy. We suggest that they should systematically make explicit and reflect on their cultural-ideological background and methodological hypothesis and choices and their effects on the socio-political context. This article is an original attempt to accept this challenge. (Résumé d'auteur)

Mots-clés Agrovoc : Modèle, Gestion des eaux

Mots-clés géographiques Agrovoc : Thaïlande

Mots-clés complémentaires : Modélisation d'accompagnement, Jeu de role

Classification Agris : U30 - Research methods
P10 - Water resources and management

Champ stratégique Cirad : Axe 6 (2005-2013) - Agriculture, environnement, nature et sociétés

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Barnaud Cécile, CIRAD-ES-UPR GREEN (FRA)
  • Van Paassen Annemarie, Wageningen University (NLD)
  • Trébuil Guy, CIRAD-ES-UPR GREEN (FRA) ORCID: 0000-0002-1370-4731
  • Promburom Tanya, Chiang Mai University (THA)
  • Bousquet François, CIRAD-ES-UPR GREEN (FRA) ORCID: 0000-0002-4552-3724

Autres liens de la publication

Source : Cirad - Agritrop (

View Item (staff only) View Item (staff only)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2020-10-30 ]