Agritrop
Home

The added-value of using participatory approaches to assess the acceptability of surveillance systems: The case of bovine tuberculosis in Belgium

Calba Clémentine, Goutard Flavie, Vanholme Luc, Antoine-Moussiaux Nicolas, Hendrikx Pascal, Saegerman Claude. 2016. The added-value of using participatory approaches to assess the acceptability of surveillance systems: The case of bovine tuberculosis in Belgium. PloS One, 11 (7):e0159041, 19 p.

Journal article ; Article de recherche ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact Revue en libre accès total
[img]
Preview
Published version - Anglais
Use under authorization by the author or CIRAD.
journal.pone.0159041_CC_FLG_PEPI_AGIRs.PDF

Télécharger (1MB) | Preview

Quartile : Q1, Sujet : MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

Liste HCERES des revues (en SHS) : oui

Thème(s) HCERES des revues (en SHS) : Psychologie-éthologie-ergonomie; Staps

Abstract : Context and Objective: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) surveillance in Belgium is essential to maintain the officially free status and to preserve animal and public health. An evaluation of the system is thus needed to ascertain the surveillance provides a precise description of the current situation in the country. The evaluation should assess stakeholders' perceptions and expectations about the system due to the fact that the acceptability has an influence on the levels of sensitivity and timeliness of the surveillance system. The objective of the study was to assess the acceptability of the bTB surveillance in Belgium, using participatory tools and the OASIS flash tool ('analysis tool for surveillance systems'). Methods: For the participatory process, focus group discussions and individual interviews were implemented with representatives involved with the system, both from cattle and wildlife part of the surveillance. Three main tools were used: (i) relational diagrams associated with smileys, (ii) flow diagrams associated with proportional piling, and (iii) impact diagrams associated with proportional piling. A total of six criteria were assessed, among which five were scored on a scale from -1 to +1. For the OASIS flash tool, one full day meeting with representatives from stakeholders involved with the surveillance was organised. A total of 19 criteria linked to acceptability were scored on a scale from 0 to 3. Results and Conclusion: Both methods highlighted a medium acceptability of the bTB surveillance. The main elements having a negative influence were the consequences of official notification of a bTB suspect case in a farm, the low remuneration paid to private veterinarians for execution of intradermal tuberculin tests and the practical difficulties about the containment of the animals. Based on the two evaluation processes, relevant recommendations to improve the surveillance were made. Based on the comparison between the two evaluation processes, the added value of the participatory approach was highlighted. (Résumé d'auteur)

Mots-clés Agrovoc : Tuberculose

Mots-clés géographiques Agrovoc : Belgique

Classification Agris : L73 - Animal diseases
U40 - Surveying methods

Champ stratégique Cirad : Axe 4 (2014-2018) - Santé des animaux et des plantes

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Calba Clémentine, CIRAD-ES-UPR AGIRs (FRA)
  • Goutard Flavie, CIRAD-ES-UPR AGIRs (THA)
  • Vanholme Luc, FASFC (BEL)
  • Antoine-Moussiaux Nicolas, Université de Liège (BEL)
  • Hendrikx Pascal, ANSES (FRA)
  • Saegerman Claude, Université de Liège (BEL)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/581205/)

View Item (staff only) View Item (staff only)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2020-10-02 ]