Agritrop
Home

Navigating protected areas as social-ecological systems: integration pathways of French nature reserves

Therville Clara, Mathevet Raphaël, Bioret Frédéric, Antona Martine. 2018. Navigating protected areas as social-ecological systems: integration pathways of French nature reserves. Regional Environmental Change, 18 (2) : pp. 607-618.

Journal article ; Article de recherche ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact
[img] Published version - Anglais
Access restricted to CIRAD agents
Use under authorization by the author or CIRAD.
10.1007_s10113-017-1231-4.pdf

Télécharger (813kB) | Request a copy

Quartile : Q2, Sujet : ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES / Quartile : Q2, Sujet : ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Liste HCERES des revues (en SHS) : oui

Thème(s) HCERES des revues (en SHS) : Géographie-Aménagement-Urbanisme-Architecture

Abstract : On a global scale, protected areas (PAs) are one of the main tools used for biodiversity conservation. However, accelerated biodiversity loss and lack of social acceptance of PAs call into question their ability to reach long-term biodiversity conservation objectives. To address this, conservation scientists and practitioners have moved from segregative to integrative models of PAs. When the segregative model sees PAs as human exclusion zones, the integrative model considers conservation and development projects and multiple partnerships with local stakeholders within and outside PAs. Given this paradigmatic evolution, a PA and its surrounding landscape are increasingly regarded as a single social-ecological system (SES). This development brings new challenges for conservationists: How should these complex and dynamic systems be managed, and how can their pathways be described and piloted? Using French nature reserves (NRs) as case studies, we propose a framework for analyzing the integration pathways of PAs within their social-ecological context. We identified the pathways of 10 NRs according to their degree of integration in the surrounding landscape (spatial), their management objectives (sectoral), and their governance systems (institutional). We analyzed these pathways using three metaphors associated with resilience thinking (adaptive cycle, adaptation, and transformation). We discussed how these 10 NRs have changed over time, revealing how practitioners anticipate future pathways and avoid undesirable states. Through an exploration of the totality of an SES's spatial, sectoral, and institutional pathways, the framework we propose is a potential tool for identifying opportunities and constraints for long-term conservation actions.

Mots-clés Agrovoc : Biodiversité, Conservation des ressources, gestion des ressources naturelles, Réserve naturelle, Zone protegée, Sociologie rurale, Politique de l'environnement, Protection de l'environnement

Mots-clés géographiques Agrovoc : France

Classification Agris : P01 - Nature conservation and land resources
E50 - Rural sociology

Champ stratégique Cirad : Axe 6 (2014-2018) - Sociétés, natures et territoires

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Therville Clara, CEFE (FRA) - auteur correspondant
  • Mathevet Raphaël, CNRS (FRA)
  • Bioret Frédéric, UBO (FRA)
  • Antona Martine, CIRAD-ES-UPR GREEN (FRA) ORCID: 0000-0002-8332-9893

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/585756/)

View Item (staff only) View Item (staff only)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2021-03-05 ]