Agritrop
Accueil

Comparison of three calibration methods for modeling rice phenology

Gao Yujing, Wallach Daniel, Liu Bing, Dingkuhn Michael, Boote Kenneth J., Singh Upendra, Asseng Senthold, Kahveci Tamer, He Jianqiang, Zhang Ruoyang, Confalonieri Roberto, Hoogenboom Gerrit. 2020. Comparison of three calibration methods for modeling rice phenology. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280:107785, 12 p.

Article de revue ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact
[img] Version publiée - Anglais
Accès réservé aux personnels Cirad
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
594192.pdf

Télécharger (2MB) | Demander une copie

Quartile : Outlier, Sujet : AGRONOMY / Quartile : Outlier, Sujet : FORESTRY / Quartile : Q1, Sujet : METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES

Résumé : Calibration is an essential step for all crop modeling studies. The goal of this study was to compare three commonly-used calibration methods including Ordinary Least Square (OLS), Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), and Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) as applied to the CSM-CERES-Rice phenology model of the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT). The analysis was performed by considering goodness-of-fit to observations, calibrated parameter values, uncertainty of parameter estimates and predictions, and the practical implementation of methods. The results showed that the selection of the calibration method has some impacts on parameter estimates and uncertainty quantifications. In the situations where goodness-of-fit is the main criterion, OLS is the fastest and most effective method. When the uncertainty of parameter estimates and model predictions are important, the MCMC method is more reliable in quantifying uncertainties. We found that for predicting phenology in our study, the GLUE method was unrealistic in quantifying model uncertainty, because the default model error variance was unlikely small. This study showed that MCMC for model calibration, coupled with estimation of model error variance, is a promising method for quantifying prediction uncertainty and that MCMC should be incorporated into crop modeling platforms.

Mots-clés Agrovoc : Oryza, phénologie, modèle de simulation

Mots-clés géographiques Agrovoc : Sénégal, Madagascar

Mots-clés libres : CSM-CERES-Rice, Parameter estimation, GLUE, MCMC, OLS, Uncertainty

Classification Agris : F40 - Écologie végétale
U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques

Champ stratégique Cirad : CTS 2 (2019-) - Transitions agroécologiques

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Gao Yujing, University of Florida (USA) - auteur correspondant
  • Wallach Daniel, INRA (FRA)
  • Liu Bing, University of Florida (USA)
  • Dingkuhn Michael, CIRAD-BIOS-UMR AGAP (FRA)
  • Boote Kenneth J., University of Florida (USA)
  • Singh Upendra, IFDC (USA)
  • Asseng Senthold, University of Florida (USA)
  • Kahveci Tamer, University of Florida (USA)
  • He Jianqiang, University of Florida (USA)
  • Zhang Ruoyang, University of Florida (USA)
  • Confalonieri Roberto, University of Milan (ITA)
  • Hoogenboom Gerrit, University of Florida (USA)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/594192/)

Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop) Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2024-03-25 ]