Agritrop
Accueil

Landscape restauration in the Amazon: land suitability and jurisdictional governance to achieve ecologic and economics goals. [ID843]

Poccard-Chapuis René, Plassin Sophie, Peçanha Jacqueline, Laurent François, Piketty Marie-Gabrielle, Pimentel Gustavo, Bourgoin Clément, Pinillos Cifuentes Daniel Alfredo, Osis Reinis, Blanc Lilian, Gomes Mario Oliveira, Gond Valéry, Betbeder Julie, Dessard Hélène, Pacheco Pablo. 2019. Landscape restauration in the Amazon: land suitability and jurisdictional governance to achieve ecologic and economics goals. [ID843]. . Bern : Global Land Programme, Résumé, 1 p. Open Science Meeting of the Global Land Programme OSM2019. 4, Bern, Suisse, 21 Avril 2019/24 Avril 2019.

Communication sans actes
[img]
Prévisualisation
Version publiée - Anglais
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
ID594965.pdf

Télécharger (115kB) | Prévisualisation

Résumé : In the Amazonian “arc of deforestation”, landscapes are a result of 50 years of systematic deforestations, driven by a "race to the land", where land appropriation was the main objective of the migrants. In this context, land accumulation was a priority over land production, and even more over sustainable management of natural resources. In consequence, current landscapes include huge areas of systematic deforestation, and disconnected forest remaining patches. Both are degraded. Agronomic productivities are decreasing, due to extractive management systems. Ecosystemic services also are low, due to forest fragmentation, soil degradation and deforestation of vulnerable areas. Since 2005 - 2008, federal policies against deforestation and forest act have fixed the usable agricultural areas, and economic growth must now take place in a limited land extension. Natural resources management becomes essential, which induces changes in farming practices. In this transition, land suitability becomes a key to organize a new farming design, zoning areas dedicated to economic production, and areas for ecosystemic services. In the first ones, improved and intensified agricultural practices are developed, valorizing best soils and or topographic units. The other areas, less productive but with a high connectivity and potentiality for water cycle and soil protection, are abounded and could go back to forest regeneration. A new forest matrix is being built, as well as a new map of agricultural production. Landscape efficiency is also defined by the optimized combination of these two maps. Land suitability defines the tradeoff between economic production and ecosystemic services. This presentation explains the Paragominas experience, in Brazilian eastern amazon, to develop a landscape restoration plan, in a jurisdictional approach. In a first step, land suitability is mapped at municipal level, using topographic data, and derived information's about soils, declivity and hydrographic network. All categories are related to farmer's practices, and discussed with them. In a second step, land uses are also mapped, especially forest cover and forest degradation, using middle resolution remote sensing data. In the third step, land uses and suitability's are spatially crossed in a GIS, in order to define strategic areas for ecosystemic services by reforestation or forest restauration, and other strategic areas for economic production, by improved practices (especially tree-crop-livestock integration). In a fourth step, this cartography become a municipal law for land use, discussed and voted in the municipal congress. In a fifth step, every farmer can develop a new farming design, according to this mapping, and possibly accessing a specific credit line and facilities. By this way, forest restoration is growing, especially in the strategic areas, and with a higher connectivity index. It is possible to improve ecosystemic services, above the Brazilian NDC in COP 21 for example, not only for carbon sequestration but also for water cycle, soil protection and biodiversity. This win-win strategy, based on land suitability, is attractive for farmers and all private sector, and also can achieve higher results than only command and control policies. In the other hand, it needs a strong monitoring capacity in the jurisdiction, and good governance mechanisms.

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Poccard-Chapuis René, CIRAD-ES-UMR SELMET (BRA) ORCID: 0000-0003-2200-0637
  • Plassin Sophie, AgroParisTech (FRA)
  • Peçanha Jacqueline
  • Laurent François, Université du Maine (FRA)
  • Piketty Marie-Gabrielle, CIRAD-ES-UPR GREEN (COL)
  • Pimentel Gustavo, EMBRAPA (BRA)
  • Bourgoin Clément, CIRAD-ES-UPR Forêts et sociétés (FRA)
  • Pinillos Cifuentes Daniel Alfredo, CIRAD-PERSYST-UPR AIDA (FRA)
  • Osis Reinis, Université du Maine (FRA)
  • Blanc Lilian, CIRAD-ES-UPR Forêts et sociétés (FRA)
  • Gomes Mario Oliveira, EMBRAPA (BRA)
  • Gond Valéry, CIRAD-ES-UPR Forêts et sociétés (FRA) ORCID: 0000-0002-0080-3140
  • Betbeder Julie, CIRAD-ES-UPR Forêts et sociétés (CRI)
  • Dessard Hélène, CIRAD-ES-UPR Forêts et sociétés (FRA)
  • Pacheco Pablo, CIFOR (BRA)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/594965/)

Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop) Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2024-03-06 ]