Agritrop
Accueil

Biomass flows in an agro-pastoral village in West-Africa: Who benefits from crop residue mulching?

Berre David, Diarisso Tidiane, Andrieu Nadine, Le Page Christophe, Corbeels Marc. 2021. Biomass flows in an agro-pastoral village in West-Africa: Who benefits from crop residue mulching?. Agricultural Systems, 187:102981, 12 p.

Article de revue ; Article de recherche ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact
[img] Version publiée - Anglais
Accès réservé aux personnels Cirad
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
Berre_2021_AS.pdf

Télécharger (4MB) | Demander une copie
[img]
Prévisualisation
Version post-print - Anglais
Sous licence Licence Creative Commons.
597360_MAA.pdf

Télécharger (1MB) | Prévisualisation

Quartile : Q1, Sujet : AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Résumé : In West Africa, new management practices such as conservation agriculture with crop residue mulching can improve crop yields for individual farmers. However, in a context of complex social interactions between farmers, the introduction of such practices can also lead to conflicts between private interests and communal use of resources, for example the free grazing of crop residues. The objective of this paper was to assess ex-ante the impacts of the practice of crop residue mulching on crop productivity in a village of central Burkina Faso using an agent-based model, AMBAWA, that simulates the flows of biomass and nutrients between crop and livestock systems at the village scale. The model considers the interactions between four types of farmers that were identified in the study site: subsistence-oriented crop farmers, market-oriented crop farmers, agro-pastoralists and pastoralists. The model simulated increased cattle migration outside the village due to increased crop residue scarcity during the dry season with increased proportions of cropland under the practice of conservation agriculture, decreasing the manure availability at village scale. Consequently, the assumed direct yield increases due to soil moisture conservation as a result of mulching did not compensate for the yield losses resulting from lesser amounts of manure available. This effect was felt most strongly by farmers who own relatively large numbers of cattle (agro-pastoralists and pastoralists). The total maize production at village level depended more on the proportion of cropping land that was available for grazing by cattle, and thus not mulched, than on a possible direct effect of mulching on yield per se. The AMBAWA model can support discussion among stakeholders (farmers, traditional and administrative authorities) who are involved in the private and communal management of crop residues and other biomass resources, in order to co-design effective arrangements and practices for their sustainable use.

Mots-clés Agrovoc : système agropastoral, agriculture de conservation, résidu de récolte, paillage, biomasse, amélioration des cultures, rendement des cultures, augmentation de rendement, modèle à base d'agents

Mots-clés géographiques Agrovoc : Afrique occidentale

Mots-clés libres : Agent-Based Model, Agro-pastoral systems, Conservation agriculture, Crop residues, Village, Mulching

Classification Agris : F07 - Façons culturales
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture

Champ stratégique Cirad : CTS 2 (2019-) - Transitions agroécologiques

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Berre David, CIRAD-PERSYST-UPR AIDA (BFA) ORCID: 0000-0001-8494-9966 - auteur correspondant
  • Diarisso Tidiane, Université de Ségou (MLI)
  • Andrieu Nadine, CIRAD-ES-UMR INNOVATION (COL)
  • Le Page Christophe, CIRAD-ES-UPR GREEN (FRA) ORCID: 0000-0002-1920-0091
  • Corbeels Marc, CIRAD-PERSYST-UPR AIDA (KEN)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/597360/)

Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop) Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2024-04-17 ]