Agritrop
Home

Questioning rent for development swaps : new market-based instruments for biodiversity acquisition and the land-use issue in tropical countries

Karsenty Alain. 2007. Questioning rent for development swaps : new market-based instruments for biodiversity acquisition and the land-use issue in tropical countries. International Forestry Review, 9 (1) : pp. 503-513.

Journal article ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact
[img] Published version - Anglais
Access restricted to CIRAD agents
Use under authorization by the author or CIRAD.
document_542166.pdf

Télécharger (80kB)

Titre français : Remettre en question la location pour l'échange au sein du développement : nouveaux instruments basés sur le marché pour acquérir la biodiversité et pour l'utilisation de la terre dans les pays tropicaux / Titre espagnol : Intercambio alquiler-desarrollo : nuevos instrumentos basados en el mercado para la adquisicion de biodiversidad y el problema del uso de la tierra en paises tropicales

Abstract : Amongst the market-based instruments designed to protect biodiversity, some directly target acquisition of land-use rights to turn natural forests into conservation areas and protect them against destructive activities such as logging or agricultural conversion. Whereas some instruments, such as Transferable Development Rights and Conservation Easements, require the privatisation of land, conservation concessions are based on financial compensations to the state, logging companies and local populations against their rights to 'develop' these lands. This principle of 'rent for development swaps' embodied in three instruments designed for buying back land use rights must be discussed according to efficiency and equity criteria. Four issues are critical in this respect: the property rights structure, prevailing local representations, the size of the area concerned and existing institutional arrangements regarding forest resource access cost. This paper suggests that the opportunity cost of setting up large scale conservation concessions is much higher than generally suggested, especially in countries which have moved away from former discretionary allocation practices and have reformed their forest sector regulation framework according to prominent donors' recommendations. It concludes that using the so-called 'lower cost of conservation' in poorest countries, which makes large scale operation affordable for conservation investors, also raises ethical issues, since this means compensating stakeholders at their current poverty level. (Résumé d'auteur)

Mots-clés Agrovoc : Utilisation des terres, Rente foncière, protection de la forêt, Conservation de la nature, Politique forestière, Incitation, Indemnisation, forêt primaire, Pays en développement, forêt tropicale, Politique de développement

Mots-clés complémentaires : Déforestation, Forêt naturelle

Classification Agris : E11 - Land economics and policies
K01 - Forestry - General aspects
K70 - Forest injuries and protection
P01 - Nature conservation and land resources
D50 - Legislation

Champ stratégique Cirad : Axe 6 (2005-2013) - Agriculture, environnement, nature et sociétés

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Karsenty Alain, CIRAD-ES-UPR Ressources forestières (FRA)

Autres liens de la publication

Source : Cirad - Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/542166/)

View Item (staff only) View Item (staff only)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2021-05-04 ]