Agritrop
Home

Climate change mitigation: Should "Avoided Deforestation" be rewarded?

Pirard Romain, Karsenty Alain. 2009. Climate change mitigation: Should "Avoided Deforestation" be rewarded?. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 28 (3-5) : pp. 434-455.

Journal article ; Article de revue à comité de lecture
[img] Published version - Anglais
Access restricted to CIRAD agents
Use under authorization by the author or CIRAD.
document_549323.pdf

Télécharger (235kB)

Abstract : It is hotly debated today whether the reduction of tropical deforestation should be supported by a mechanism within the Convention for Climate Change. This mechanism, known as "avoided deforestation," would benefit developing countries that voluntarily reduce their deforestation rates, thereby generating at least two positive impacts: (a) an increase in the financial resources available to curb tropical deforestation, with expected positive side effects on biodiversity conservation, the environmental services provided by these forests, and sustainable development as a whole; and (b) a greater effectiveness of the global fight against climate change, because tropical deforestation contributes extensively to world carbon emissions. Several proposals were designed for such a mechanism, yet their implementation poses significant methodological problems: first, sophisticated tools available to measure the reduction of emissions might be ineffective when combined with baselines on a national level secondly, baselines calculated ex ante lack accuracy because of insufficient knowledge concerning the direct and underlying causes of deforestation; thirdly, baselines calculated ex post lack legitimacy because they only refer to past trends; and fourthly, it is challenging to relate a reduction in deforestation rates to public policy options in the host country.Drawing lessons from our analysis of the methodological problems for the implementation of the mechanism, we recommend not promoting any mechanism based on financial rewards for an assumed voluntary reduction of national tropical deforestation rates. Two reasons justify our perspective: not only would the mechanism probably generate fake reductions ("hot air"), but undesirable side effects-detailed in this paper-would also appear. Instead, we encourage industrialized countries to better use already existing multi-and bilateral instruments, which focus on the correction of governance deficiencies in countries home to tropical forests. It is also necessary to focus on the suppression of "perverse incentives" from public policies in tropical countries. (Résumé d'auteur)

Mots-clés Agrovoc : Changement climatique, forêt tropicale, Déboisement, Incitation, Politique financière, Gaz à effet de serre, Politique forestière, Pays en développement, atténuation des effets du changement climatique

Mots-clés géographiques Agrovoc : Afrique, Venezuela (République bolivarienne du), Brésil

Mots-clés complémentaires : Déforestation

Classification Agris : P40 - Meteorology and climatology
P01 - Nature conservation and land resources
K01 - Forestry - General aspects

Champ stratégique Cirad : Axe 6 (2005-2013) - Agriculture, environnement, nature et sociétés

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Pirard Romain, IDDRI (FRA)
  • Karsenty Alain, CIRAD-ES-UPR Ressources forestières (FRA)

Autres liens de la publication

Source : Cirad - Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/549323/)

View Item (staff only) View Item (staff only)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2021-04-24 ]