Lessons learnt about collaborative research from the EU project JOLISAA (JOint Learning in Innovation Systems in African Agriculture)

Van Den Berg Jolanda, Almekinders Cornelia, Floquet Anne, Sellamna Nour-Eddine, Davo Vodouhê Simplice, Kamau Geoffrey, Letty Brigid, Stevens Joe B., Rootman Gerrit, Triomphe Bernard. 2014. Lessons learnt about collaborative research from the EU project JOLISAA (JOint Learning in Innovation Systems in African Agriculture). In : Proceedings of the International Workshop on Agricultural Innovation Systems in Africa (AISA), 29-31 May 2013, Nairobi, Kenya. Triomphe Bernard (ed.), Waters-Bayer Ann (ed.), Klerkx Laurens (ed.), Cullen Beth (ed.), Kamau Geoffrey (ed.), Le Borgne Ewen (ed.). Montpellier : CIRAD, pp. 181-185. International Workshop on Agricultural Innovation Systems in Africa, Nairobi, Kenya, 29 May 2013/31 May 2013.

Paper with proceedings
[img] Published version - Anglais
Access restricted to CIRAD agents
Use under authorization by the author or CIRAD.

Télécharger (205kB)

Abstract : The increased concern about the capacity of (inter)national agricultural research to create societal impact urges research to reflect on its role in society and to adopt an innovation systems approach, enhancing multilevel stakeholder learning and negotiation for new technologies and institutional and organisational arrangements (e.g. World Bank 2012). But what does this mean for practice? This paper reflects on the joint learning process undertaken by a research consortium consisting of three African national research teams and four European teams. Its purpose was to study innovation processes in the framework of the EU-funded multipartner project JOint Learning in Innovation Systems in African Agriculture (JOLISAA). The project was implemented in 2010-13 in Benin, Kenya and South Africa, where innovation cases were inventorised, selected, screened and collaboratively assessed by multistakeholder teams. Results indicated that researchers learnt about innovation from the cases they studied and about the interaction with the stakeholders in the individual case assessments and from other collaborative assessment teams. The project duration was too short and the resource base too limited for adequate development of the concepts used, and the diverging views on what joint learning in the project meant hindered the development and implementation of a learning agenda. We conclude that integrated multistakeholder approaches that combine participatory research activities with reflective learning and capacity building for all research participants are highly desirable but not easy to implement. They require longer timespans to develop effective partnerships. (Résumé d'auteur)

Classification Agris : E14 - Development economics and policies
E50 - Rural sociology
U30 - Research methods

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Van Den Berg Jolanda, LEI (NLD)
  • Almekinders Cornelia, Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group (NLD)
  • Floquet Anne, UAC (BEN)
  • Sellamna Nour-Eddine, ICRA (FRA)
  • Davo Vodouhê Simplice, UAC (BEN)
  • Kamau Geoffrey, KARI (KEN)
  • Letty Brigid, INR (ZAF)
  • Stevens Joe B., University of Pretoria (ZAF)
  • Rootman Gerrit, LDA [Limpopo Department of Agriculture] (ZAF)
  • Triomphe Bernard, CIRAD-ES-UMR INNOVATION (FRA)

Source : Cirad - Agritrop (

View Item (staff only) View Item (staff only)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2020-06-25 ]