Agritrop
Home

Restoring Government Forest Policy Prerogative? The EU FLEGT Ambivalent relationship with Private Rulemaking in the Congolese Case

Karsenty Alain, Montouroy Yves. 2017. Restoring Government Forest Policy Prerogative? The EU FLEGT Ambivalent relationship with Private Rulemaking in the Congolese Case. In : Book of Abstracts IUFRO 125th Anniversary Congress 2017. IUFRO. Baden-Württemberg : Forstliche Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt (FVA)-IUFRO, Résumé, p. 270. ISBN 978-3-902762-88-7 125th IUFRO Anniversary Congress, Freiburg, Allemagne, 18 September 2017/22 September 2017.

Paper with proceedings
[img]
Preview
Published version - Anglais
Use under authorization by the author or CIRAD.
ID586624.pdf

Télécharger (364kB) | Preview

Abstract : The aim of our presentation is to critically explore the FLEGT VPAs implementation. VPAs can be seen as an endeavour of both the beneficiaries' governments and the EU to restore the prerogatives of the public authorities regarding the control of legality. By seeking certification of all the country's production of timber, successful VPAs would question the added value of independent certification schemes, such as the FSC. However, the VPA success is far from being achieved. We especially seek to analyse the private actors and experts role. We argue here that the FLEGT has lead to an ambivalent relationship with private rulemaking and expertise. First, the EU policy transfer towards developing states occurs in a sector dominated by private rules. NGOs, firms, experts have a contentious relationship with the EU authorities as they attempt to curve EU FLEGT policy objectives regarding their own technical norms and sustainability definition. Second, experts are omnipresent. The EU and VPA state simultaneously mandate them to implement and to monitor the FLEGT VPA as the same expert already define technical norms that ground forest certification schemes. Third, the national administrations have proved unable to set a reliable national system of legal verification and traceability (SVLT) and are considering endorsing private system implemented by forest companies for EUTR compliance as "equivalent" to national norms. Grounded on a qualitative methodology, interviews with EU, Congolese and transnational organization representatives and research fields in Congo, we first analyse the EU policy transfers and then we seek to analyse the changing relationship with private actors. What are we learning from this new relationship between EU and transnational rule and how can we study it in multiscalar governance? (Résumé d'auteur)

Classification Agris : K10 - Forestry production
K01 - Forestry - General aspects
D50 - Legislation
E71 - International trade

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Karsenty Alain, CIRAD-ES-UPR GREEN (FRA)
  • Montouroy Yves, UAG (GLP)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/586624/)

View Item (staff only) View Item (staff only)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2019-10-24 ]