Agritrop
Accueil

Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job

Voinov Alexey, Jenni Karen, Gray Steven, Kolagani Nagesh, Glynn Pierre, Bommel Pierre, Prell Christina, Zellner Moira, Paolisso Michael, Jordan Rebecca, Sterling Eleanor, Schmitt Olabisi Laura, Giabbanelli Philippe J., Sun Zhanli, Le Page Christophe, Elsawah Sondoss, BenDor Todd, Kubacek Klaus, Laursen Bethany, Jetter Antonie, Basco-Carrera Laura, Singer Alison, Young Laura, Brunacini Jessica, Smajgl Alex. 2018. Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job. Environmental Modelling and Software, 109 : 232-255.

Article de revue ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact
[img] Version publiée - Anglais
Accès réservé aux personnels Cirad
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
Voinov_2018_EMS.pdf

Télécharger (3MB) | Demander une copie

Quartile : Q1, Sujet : COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS / Quartile : Q1, Sujet : ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES / Quartile : Q2, Sujet : ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL

Liste HCERES des revues (en SHS) : oui

Thème(s) HCERES des revues (en SHS) : Géographie-Aménagement-Urbanisme-Architecture

Résumé : Various tools and methods are used in participatory modelling, at different stages of the process and for different purposes. The diversity of tools and methods can create challenges for stakeholders and modelers when selecting the ones most appropriate for their projects. We offer a systematic overview, assessment, and categorization of methods to assist modelers and stakeholders with their choices and decisions. Most available literature provides little justification or information on the reasons for the use of particular methods or tools in a given study. In most of the cases, it seems that the prior experience and skills of the modelers had a dominant effect on the selection of the methods used. While we have not found any real evidence of this approach being wrong, we do think that putting more thought into the method selection process and choosing the most appropriate method for the project can produce better results. Based on expert opinion and a survey of modelers engaged in participatory processes, we offer practical guidelines to improve decisions about method selection at different stages of the participatory modeling process.

Classification Agris : U10 - Informatique, mathématiques et statistiques
U30 - Méthodes de recherche
000 - Autres thèmes

Champ stratégique Cirad : Axe 6 (2014-2018) - Sociétés, natures et territoires

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Voinov Alexey, University of Sydney (AUS) - auteur correspondant
  • Jenni Karen, US Geological Survey (USA)
  • Gray Steven, MSU (USA)
  • Kolagani Nagesh, Indian Institute of Technology (IND)
  • Glynn Pierre, US Geological Survey (USA)
  • Bommel Pierre, CIRAD-ES-UPR GREEN (CRI) ORCID: 0000-0002-7776-9075
  • Prell Christina, University of Maryland (USA)
  • Zellner Moira, University of Illinois (USA)
  • Paolisso Michael, University of Maryland (USA)
  • Jordan Rebecca, Rutgers University (USA)
  • Sterling Eleanor, AMNH (USA)
  • Schmitt Olabisi Laura, MSU (USA)
  • Giabbanelli Philippe J., Furman University (USA)
  • Sun Zhanli, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (DEU)
  • Le Page Christophe, CIRAD-ES-UPR GREEN (FRA) ORCID: 0000-0002-1920-0091
  • Elsawah Sondoss, UNSW Sidney (AUS)
  • BenDor Todd, North Carolina State University (USA)
  • Kubacek Klaus, University of Maryland (USA)
  • Laursen Bethany, MSU (USA)
  • Jetter Antonie, Portland State University (USA)
  • Basco-Carrera Laura, University of Twente (NLD)
  • Singer Alison, MSU (USA)
  • Young Laura, MSU (USA)
  • Brunacini Jessica, MSU (USA)
  • Smajgl Alex, MERFI (THA)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/588722/)

Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop) Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2024-04-19 ]