Multiple outcomes of building an information system to manage reflexive impact evaluations for agricultural research

Blundo Canto Genowefa, Devaux-Spatarakis Agathe, Martin Pierre, De Romemont Aurelle, D'Agostino Bruno, Mouret Nans. 2018. Multiple outcomes of building an information system to manage reflexive impact evaluations for agricultural research. . Thessaloniki : s.n., 1 p. European Evaluation Society Biennal Conference: Evaluation for more resilient societies. 13, Thessaloniki, Grèce, 1 May 2018/5 May 2018.

Paper without proceedings
[img] Published version - Anglais
Access restricted to CIRAD agents
Use under authorization by the author or CIRAD.
Blundo et al. 2018.pdf

Télécharger (63kB) | Request a copy

Abstract : The cross-case analysis of impact evaluations of research actions is a key to improve organizational evidence-based learning from both quantitative and qualitative data. Researchers at Cirad, the French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development, have developed a systemic ex post evaluation method, called ImpresS, to evaluate the impacts of the research in the south. The method relies on four tools to describe an innovation process: 1) innovation story, 2) stakeholder map, 3) impact pathway, and 4) capacity strengthening. ImpresS was tested on 13 case studies, representing a diversity of innovation processes in which Cirad research was involved over the long term. The systematization of data from the evaluation reports provided a wealth of information that was translated into an information system. This translation enabled different outcomes. First, cross-case analysis allowed the institution to better understand the nature and modalities through which its research activities lead to developmental impacts. Secondly, it supported the systematization of institutional memory and provided the basis for a formalized web-based interface that allows management, storage and export of ex post evaluations' data. As a further outcome, the information system was upgraded to provide a graphic tool for ex ante scenario development. These outcomes of translating evaluation reports into an information system provide key insights into the value of knowledge management for institutional learning and support of research activities.

Mots-clés libres : Impact evaluation, Knowledge management, Methodology

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Blundo Canto Genowefa, CIRAD-ES-UMR INNOVATION (FRA) ORCID: 0000-0003-4182-3663
  • Devaux-Spatarakis Agathe, Quadrant Conseil (FRA)
  • Martin Pierre, CIRAD-PERSYST-UPR AIDA (FRA) ORCID: 0000-0002-4874-5795
  • De Romemont Aurelle, CIRAD-DRS-VALO (FRA)
  • D'Agostino Bruno, Université de Montpellier (FRA)
  • Mouret Nans

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (

View Item (staff only) View Item (staff only)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2019-10-08 ]