Try, try again: Lessons learned from success and failure in participatory modeling

Sterling Eleanor, Zellner Moira, Jenni Karen, Leong Kirsten, Glynn Pierre, BenDor Todd, Bommel Pierre, Hubacek Klaus, Jetter Antonie, Jordan Rebecca, Schmitt Olabisi Laura, Paolisso Michael, Gray Steven. 2019. Try, try again: Lessons learned from success and failure in participatory modeling. Elementa, 7:9, 13 p.

Journal article ; Article de synthèse ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact Revue en libre accès total
Published version - Anglais
License Licence Creative Commons.

Télécharger (875kB) | Preview


Abstract : Participatory Modeling (PM) is becoming increasingly common in environmental planning and conservation, due in part to advances in cyberinfrastructure as well as to greater recognition of the importance of engaging a diverse array of stakeholders in decision making. We provide lessons learned, based on over 200 years of the authors' cumulative and diverse experience, about PM processes. These include successful and, perhaps more importantly, not-so-successful trials. Our collective interdisciplinary background has supported the development, testing, and evaluation of a rich range of collaborative modeling approaches. We share here what we have learned as a community of participatory modelers, within three categories of reflection: a) lessons learned about participatory modelers; b) lessons learned about the context of collaboration; and c) lessons learned about the PM process. First, successful PM teams encompass a variety of skills beyond modeling expertise. Skills include: effective relationship-building, openness to learn from local experts, awareness of personal motivations and biases, and ability to translate discussions into models and to assess success. Second, the context for collaboration necessitates a culturally appropriate process for knowledge generation and use, for involvement of community co-leads, and for understanding group power dynamics that might influence how people from different backgrounds interact. Finally, knowing when to use PM and when not to, managing expectations, and effectively and equitably addressing conflicts is essential. Managing the participation process in PM is as important as managing the model building process. We recommend that PM teams consider what skills are present within a team, while ensuring inclusive creative space for collaborative exploration and learning supported by simple yet relevant models. With a realistic view of what it entails, PM can be a powerful approach that builds collective knowledge and social capital, thus helping communities to take charge of their future and address complex social and environmental problems.

Mots-clés Agrovoc : Protection de l'environnement, gestion des ressources naturelles, Politique de l'environnement, Gouvernance, approches participatives, Planification

Mots-clés libres : Participatory modeling, Collaborative modeling, Stakeholder engagement, Planning, Environmental management

Classification Agris : P01 - Nature conservation and land resources
E14 - Development economics and policies
E50 - Rural sociology

Champ stratégique Cirad : CTS 1 (2019-) - Biodiversité

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Sterling Eleanor, AMNH (USA) - auteur correspondant
  • Zellner Moira, University of Illinois (USA)
  • Jenni Karen, US Geological Survey (USA)
  • Leong Kirsten, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (USA)
  • Glynn Pierre, US Geological Survey (USA)
  • BenDor Todd, North Carolina State University (USA)
  • Bommel Pierre, CIRAD-ES-UPR GREEN (CRI) ORCID: 0000-0002-7776-9075
  • Hubacek Klaus, University of Maryland (USA)
  • Jetter Antonie, Portland State University (USA)
  • Jordan Rebecca, Rutgers University (USA)
  • Schmitt Olabisi Laura, MSU (USA)
  • Paolisso Michael, University of Maryland (USA)
  • Gray Steven, MSU (USA)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (

View Item (staff only) View Item (staff only)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2021-05-02 ]