Agritrop
Accueil

Power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance

Vallet Ameline, Locatelli Bruno, Barnaud Cécile, Makowski David, Quispe Condé Yésica, Levrel Harold. 2020. Power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 114 : 329-340.

Article de revue ; Article de recherche ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact
[img] Version publiée - Anglais
Accès réservé aux personnels Cirad
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
Vallet 2020 Power asymmetries in social networks of ecosystem services governance.pdf

Télécharger (3MB) | Demander une copie

Quartile : Q1, Sujet : ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Liste HCERES des revues (en SHS) : oui

Thème(s) HCERES des revues (en SHS) : Economie-gestion

Résumé : Power asymmetries affect the governance of natural resources but are rarely considered explicitly in ecosystem services research, which often overlooks the diversity of actors and their interactions. In this paper, we propose an innovative and easily replicable method to analyze two types of power asymmetries, using social network analysis and a power typology which distinguishes between influence and domination. We apply this method to a network of actors involved in the governance of eight ecosystem services in the Peruvian Andes. The results reveal substantial power asymmetries, of different types. Indirect managers of ecosystem services had higher influence and domination than the direct managers and beneficiaries. Businesses showed significantly lower influence than members of civil society, non-governmental organizations, and the public sector (state or decentralized organizations, public enterprises). Compared to other actors, members of the public sector had significantly higher domination, especially national actors. Domination and influence relationships strongly increased conflict probability, along with difference of domination score between two actors. A better interdisciplinary understanding of the determinants of power asymmetries can make the governance of socio-ecological systems more sustainable.

Mots-clés Agrovoc : services écosystémiques, gouvernance, gestion des ressources naturelles, environnement socioéconomique, réseaux sociaux, groupe d'influence

Mots-clés géographiques Agrovoc : Pérou

Mots-clés libres : Social-ecological system, Management, Influence, Domination, Actors

Classification Agris : P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E50 - Sociologie rurale

Champ stratégique Cirad : CTS 5 (2019-) - Territoires

Agences de financement européennes : European Commission

Programme de financement européen : H2020

Projets sur financement : Non spécifié

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Vallet Ameline, AgroParisTech (FRA) - auteur correspondant
  • Locatelli Bruno, CIRAD-ES-UPR Forêts et sociétés (FRA) ORCID: 0000-0003-2983-1644
  • Barnaud Cécile, INRAE (FRA)
  • Makowski David, CIRAD-ES-UMR CIRED (FRA)
  • Quispe Condé Yésica, SUNASS (PER)
  • Levrel Harold, Université Paris-Saclay (FRA)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/596506/)

Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop) Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2024-03-27 ]