Barreteau Olivier, Abrami Géraldine, Chennit Saléha, Garin Patrice.
2006. Support to stakeholder involvement in water management circumventing some participation pitfalls.
In : Water governance for sustainable development : approaches and lessons from developing and transitional countries. Perret Sylvain (ed.), Farolfi Stefano (ed.), Hassan Rashid (ed.)
Version publiée
- Anglais
Accès réservé aux personnels Cirad Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad. ID534731.pdf Télécharger (5MB) |
Résumé : Public participation is increasingly involved in collective decision-making processes at the local level, although what actually is meant by participation is rarely specified and varies widely. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive contains a specific article regarding participation. In Africa, new national policies have attempted to involve stakeholders and citizens in collective decision-making processes and in the implementation of their outputs. Participation is currently promoted by international institutions. This has led to the widespread acknowledgement that concerned people should be more involved in decision-making processes, at least in the field of natural resource management. This new trend towards participation is generating new issues: How should the involvement of stakeholders be implemented? What pitfalls need to be avoided and what side effects need to be managed? What can be considered as involvement of concerned people, and how diverse can such involvement be? Agent-based models (ABMs) and role playing games (RPGs) are increasingly being used, separately or together, to facilitate dialogue in territory planning and natural resource management (Bousquet et al, 2002). This is due to the capacity of such tools to simulate and handle complexity. This paper introduces such a tool, PIEPLUE, as a support for dialogue on water sharing issues. Before presenting PIEPLUE, we discuss some of the diversity in what is considered participation according to two dimensions: the level of involvement and the stage of involvement in the decision-making process. We also identify the pitfalls that PIEPLUE aims to circumvent, such as a disproportionate focus on private interests, the emergence of new lead groups which might not be legitimate and interference in existing conflicts.
Mots-clés Agrovoc : gestion des ressources, participation, aide à la décision, irrigation
Mots-clés complémentaires : Action collective, Système multiagents, Jeu de role
Classification Agris : P10 - Ressources en eau et leur gestion
Champ stratégique Cirad : Axe 6 (2005-2013) - Agriculture, environnement, nature et sociétés
Auteurs et affiliations
- Barreteau Olivier
- Abrami Géraldine, CIRAD-TERA-UPR GREEN (FRA)
- Chennit Saléha
- Garin Patrice
Autres liens de la publication
Source : Cirad - Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/534731/)
[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2024-01-28 ]