Agritrop
Accueil

Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services payments

Biénabe Estelle, Hearne Robert R.. 2006. Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services payments. Forest Policy and Economics, 9 (4) : 335-348.

Article de revue ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact
[img] Version publiée - Anglais
Accès réservé aux personnels Cirad
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
534988.pdf

Télécharger (321kB) | Demander une copie

Résumé : Choice experiments are used to investigate the preferences and the willingness to pay of foreign tourists and Costa Ricans for increased support for nature conservation and scenic beauty through a system of Payments for Environmental Services (PESs). In order to assess preferences for these different public goods services of private forests, survey respondents were asked to choose between spatially differentiated areas to receive PESs. Through different experts and focus groups, the establishment of PESs in remote areas was acknowledged to favor nature conservation and their establishment in accessible areas, to favor scenic beauty. A survey was conducted among Costa Rican residents and both Costa Rican and foreign tourists. Results of the nested multinomial logit model show that both populations support increased PESs dedicated to both nature conservation and scenic beauty. These results were robust across respondents with different socioeconomic characteristics, but among both populations higher income groups were more willing to contribute to PESs. Willingness to pay for nature conservation PESs was greater than for scenic beauty reflecting an acceptance of the existence value of nature. Respondents' preferences for alternative payment vehicles were mixed, with foreign tourists preferring voluntary contributions and Costa Ricans being indifferent. This research demonstrates that choice experiments, including a significant initial research step of experts and focus group consultation, can aid in incorporating stakeholder preferences into the design and evolution of conservation policy instruments. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Classification Agris : P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E10 - Économie et politique agricoles

Champ stratégique Cirad : Axe 6 (2005-2013) - Agriculture, environnement, nature et sociétés

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Biénabe Estelle, CIRAD-TERA-UPR Qualités et territoires (FRA)
  • Hearne Robert R., North Dakota State University (USA)

Autres liens de la publication

Source : Cirad - Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/534988/)

Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop) Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2024-12-18 ]