Economic analysis and food security contribution of supplemental irrigation and farm ponds: evidence from northern Burkina Faso

Zongo Beteo, Barbier Bruno, Diarra Abdoulaye, Zorom Malicki, Atewamba Calvin, Combary Omer S., Ouédraogo Souleymane, Toe Patrice, Hamma Yacouba, Dogot Thomas. 2022. Economic analysis and food security contribution of supplemental irrigation and farm ponds: evidence from northern Burkina Faso. Agriculture and Food Security, 11 (4), 18 p.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00347-0

Article de revue ; Article de recherche ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact Revue en libre accès total

Prévisualisation

Version publiée - Anglais
Sous licence

.
2022 zongo Economic analysis and food security.pdf
Télécharger (2MB) | Prévisualisation

Résumé : Background: Dry spells are serious obstacles to rainfed agriculture in Sahelian countries. Various water harvesting techniques are used by farmers to reduce the impact of climate variability, but are not sufficient in the case of a prolonged drought lasting 2–3 weeks. The farmers believe supplemental irrigation is a good way to adapt rainfed agriculture to dry spells. In this study, we evaluated the food contribution and profitability of supplemental irrigation of rainfed crops comparing various farm ponds that collect runoff water from the surrounding landscape. Methods: We analyzed the contribution of supplemental irrigation to food security and compared the profitability of different types of ponds constructed by farmers in northern Burkina Faso. Human cereal requirement was used as indicators to analyze the contribution of supplemental irrigation to food security. The criteria for analyzing the profitability of the selected ponds were gross margin (GM), net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR) and payback period (PBP). Results: Our results show that the additional yield of corn obtained with supplemental irrigation makes it possible to meet the monthly cereal needs of at least 17 people and generates an additional GM of FCFA 178,483 (US$ 309.26) compared to no irrigation. The estimate of the NPV, from IRR and PBP showed that the profitability of supplemental irrigation in 15 agricultural seasons varies between the type of ponds constructed. Conclusions: Given the up-front cost and the farmers' lack of resources, the ponds require a subsidy or a credit policy to facilitate the adoption of supplemental irrigation in Sahelian countries. However, the irrigation strategies to optimize agricultural income remain a field of research to be explored.

Mots-clés Agrovoc : irrigation, irrigation de complément, culture pluviale, sécurité alimentaire, analyse économique, culture irriguée, variation saisonnière, sécheresse, construction d'étang, précipitation, analyse coût avantage, rendement des cultures, irrigation par ruissellement