Agritrop
Accueil

Revealing salient aquatic ecosystem services bundles in the Olifants River catchment, South Africa

Jourdain Damien, Namakando Namakando, Mungatana Eric Dada, Mirzabaev Alisher, Njiraini Georgina. 2023. Revealing salient aquatic ecosystem services bundles in the Olifants River catchment, South Africa. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 31 (2) : 267-286.

Article de revue ; Article de recherche ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact
[img] Version Online first - Anglais
Accès réservé aux personnels Cirad
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
Jourdainetal2023WetlandsEcology.pdf

Télécharger (1MB) | Demander une copie
[img] Version publiée - Anglais
Accès réservé aux personnels Cirad
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
604823.pdf

Télécharger (1MB) | Demander une copie

Résumé : Preserving water quality, which has at least four of the ten characteristics of a “wicked problem”, is fundamental for economic development, ecosystems function, and human wellbeing. Consequently, identifying suitable public policies or technological solutions that can maintain or restore affected ecosystems, especially in river catchments, is a huge challenge. Understanding diverse stakeholder perspectives on important aquatic ecosystem services is critical to improving water governance and quality. This study uses the Q-methodology to identify and analyze perspectives about aquatic ecosystem services in the Olifants River catchment, one of the most important and polluted in South Africa, across six diverse stakeholder groups competing for its limited water resources. The Q methodology is a semi-qualitative methodology that can systematically recover detailed views of the subjective perceptions diverse stakeholder groups hold on a given topic. Our results suggest existence of three significant and conflicting perspectives. The “conservationists” prioritize regulation and supporting services, the “water users” give highest priority to water for domestic and other private uses, while the “planners” rank mastering the environment for societal benefits highest. Equally importantly, our results suggest the possibility of solutions that can deliver services ranked highly by some stakeholders without compromising the welfare of others who hold neutral perspectives towards them.

Mots-clés Agrovoc : services écosystémiques

Mots-clés géographiques Agrovoc : Afrique du Sud

Mots-clés libres : Wetlands, Ecosystem Services (ES), Q methodology, ESwatini

Classification Agris : P10 - Ressources en eau et leur gestion
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières

Champ stratégique Cirad : CTS 5 (2019-) - Territoires

Agences de financement hors UE : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Projets sur financement : (DEU) Integrated Water Governance Support System

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Jourdain Damien, CIRAD-ES-UMR G-EAU (ZAF) ORCID: 0000-0001-8707-5221 - auteur correspondant
  • Namakando Namakando, University of Pretoria (ZAF)
  • Mungatana Eric Dada, University of Pretoria (ZAF)
  • Mirzabaev Alisher, Universität Bonn (DEU)
  • Njiraini Georgina, Universität Bonn (DEU)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/604823/)

Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop) Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2024-12-18 ]