Agritrop
Accueil

Ex-ante farm-scale analysis of the impacts of livestock intensification on greenhouse gas emissions of mixed crop-livestock systems in Sub-Saharan Africa

Vayssières Jonathan, Birnholz Celine, Hutchings N.J.. 2016. Ex-ante farm-scale analysis of the impacts of livestock intensification on greenhouse gas emissions of mixed crop-livestock systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. . Melbourne : s.n., 2 p. International Greenhouse Gas and Animal Agriculture (GGAA 2016). 6, Melbourne, Australie, 14 Février 2016/18 Février 2016.

Communication sans actes
[img]
Prévisualisation
Version publiée - Anglais
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
Abstract_Vayssieres_FarmAC_Senegal_GGAA_2016_Melbourne.pdf

Télécharger (123kB) | Prévisualisation
[img] Version publiée - Anglais
Accès réservé aux personnels Cirad
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
OralPresentation_Vayssieres_FarmAC_Senegal_GGAA_2016_Melbourne.pdf

Télécharger (1MB) | Demander une copie

Matériel d'accompagnement : 1 diaporama (18 vues)

Résumé : Livestock intensification is widely assumed to be an effective way to mitigate the environmental footprint of livestock products in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However it does not make sense to evaluate livestock farming separately when the majority of farming systems in SSA are mixed crop-livestock systems. The aim of this study was consequently to use a whole-farm simulation model to properly evaluate the impacts of livestock intensification. The model, FarmAC, is a stock-flow model representing the carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycles. The calculated greenhouse gas (GHG) balance takes both direct and indirect on-farm emissions in account. Three mixed millet-groundnut-beef cattle farming systems typical of those in the groundnut basin of Senegal were simulated: (i) a traditional extensive farm based on free-grazing and night corralling (Farm 1), (ii) an intensive farm where manure is collected from fattening cattle and used to fertilize crops (Farm 2), and (iii) an improved intensive farm similar to Farm 2 but where further nutrient conservation techniques such as covering the manure heap and in-soil manure incorporation are used (Farm 3). Our findings confirm the effectiveness of livestock intensification and underline the mitigation effect of nutrient conservation. The GHG balance decreased by 17% after intensification (from Farm 1 to Farm 2), and by a further 12% when nutrient conservation techniques were also applied (from Farm 2 to Farm 3). In fact, better feeding practices also increased the amount of C and N available throughout the cycles via manure management, and consequently also improve crop production if the nutrients are well conserved. While in the 20th century, efforts in SSA were mainly concentrated on intensification, our results suggest that current agricultural policies should now also support the design and dissemination of nutrient conservation techniques to reinforce observed livestock intensification dynamics.

Mots-clés libres : Mitigation of climate change, Farm modelling, Nutrient cycles, Mixed crop-livestock systems, Senegal, Carbon cycle, Nutrient conservation

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Vayssières Jonathan, CIRAD-ES-UMR SELMET (REU) ORCID: 0000-0003-3127-7208
  • Birnholz Celine, Wageningen University (NLD)
  • Hutchings N.J., AU (DNK)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/608551/)

Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop) Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2024-03-06 ]