Feedback loops drive ecological succession: towards a unified conceptual framework

Van Breugel Michiel, Bongers Frans, Norden Natalia, Meave Jorge A., Amissah Lucy, Chanthorn Wirong, Chazdon Robin, Craven Dylan, Farrior Caroline E., Hall Jefferson, Herault Bruno, Jakovac Catarina C., Lebrija-Trejos Edwin, Martínez-Ramos Miguel, Muñoz Rodrigo, Poorter Lourens, Rüger Nadja, van der Sande Masha T., Dent Daisy H.. 2024. Feedback loops drive ecological succession: towards a unified conceptual framework. Biological Reviews - Cambridge Philosophical Society, 99 (3) : 928-949.

Résumé : The core principle shared by most theories and models of succession is that, following a major disturbance, plant–environment feedback dynamics drive a directional change in the plant community. The most commonly studied feedback loops are those in which the regrowth of the plant community causes changes to the abiotic (e.g. soil nutrients) or biotic (e.g. dispersers) environment, which differentially affect species availability or performance. This, in turn, leads to shifts in the species composition of the plant community. However, there are many other PE feedback loops that potentially drive succession, each of which can be considered a model of succession. While plant–environment feedback loops in principle generate predictable successional trajectories, succession is generally observed to be highly variable. Factors contributing to this variability are the stochastic processes involved in feedback dynamics, such as individual mortality and seed dispersal, and extrinsic causes of succession, which are not affected by changes in the plant community but do affect species performance or availability. Both can lead to variation in the identity of dominant species within communities. This, in turn, leads to further contingencies if these species differ in their effect on their environment (priority effects). Predictability and variability are thus intrinsically linked features of ecological succession. We present a new conceptual framework of ecological succession that integrates the propositions discussed above. This framework defines seven general causes: landscape context, disturbance and land-use, biotic factors, abiotic factors, species availability, species performance, and the plant community. When involved in a feedback loop, these general causes drive succession and when not, they are extrinsic causes that create variability in successional trajectories and dynamics. The proposed framework provides a guide for linking these general causes into causal pathways that represent specific models of succession. Our framework represents a systematic approach to identifying the main feedback processes and causes of variation at different successional stages. It can be used for systematic comparisons among study sites and along environmental gradients, to conceptualise studies, and to guide the formulation of research questions and design of field studies. Mapping an extensive field study onto our conceptual framework revealed that the pathways representing the study's empirical outcomes and conceptual model had important differences, underlining the need to move beyond the conceptual models that currently dominate in specific fields and to find ways to examine the importance of and interactions among alternative causal pathways of succession. To further this aim, we argue for integrating long-term studies across environmental and anthropogenic gradients, combined with controlled experiments and dynamic modelling.

Mots-clés Agrovoc : écologie, communauté végétale, modélisation environnementale, phytoécologie

Mots-clés libres : Ecological succession, Plant-environment feedback loops, Causes of variability, Landscape context, Biotic and physical environment, Disturbance and land use, Conceptual framework

Agences de financement hors UE : Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Forest Global Earth Observatory Smithsonian, Heising-Simons Foundation, HSBC Climate Partnership, Small World Foundation, Yale-NUS College, Singapore's Ministry of Education

Projets sur financement : (USA) Agua Salud

Auteurs et affiliations

• Van Breugel Michiel, National University of Singapore (SGP) - auteur correspondant
• Bongers Frans, Wageningen University and Research Centre (NLD)
• Norden Natalia, Instituto de Investigacion de Recursos Biologicos Alexander von Humboldt (COL)
• Meave Jorge A., UNAM (MEX)
• Amissah Lucy, FORIG (GHA)
• Chanthorn Wirong, Kasetsart University (THA)
• Chazdon Robin, University of the Sunshine Coast (AUS)
• Craven Dylan, Universidad Mayor (CHL)
• Farrior Caroline E., University of Texas (USA)
• Hall Jefferson, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PAN)
• Herault Bruno, CIRAD-ES-UPR Forêts et sociétés (FRA) ORCID: 0000-0002-6950-7286
• Jakovac Catarina C., UFSC (BRA)
• Lebrija-Trejos Edwin, Université de Haïfa (ISR)
• Martínez-Ramos Miguel, Université Autonome de Mexico (MEX)
• Muñoz Rodrigo, Wageningen University (NLD)
• Poorter Lourens, Wageningen University (NLD)
• Rüger Nadja, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PAN)
• van der Sande Masha T., Wageningen University (NLD)
• Dent Daisy H., Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PAN)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/610153/)

Métriques

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2024-12-16 ]