Agritrop
Accueil

Risk assessment, eradication, and biological control: global efforts to limit Australian acacia invasions

Wilson John R. U., Gairifo Claire, Gibson Michelle R., Arianoutsou Margarita, Bakar Baki B., Baret Stéphane, Celesti-Grapow Laura, DiTomaso Joseph M., Dufour-Dror Jean-Marc, Kueffer Christophe, Kull Christian A., Hoffmann John H., Impson Fiona A. C., Loope Lloyd L., Marchante Elizabete, Marchante Hélia, Moore Joslin L., Murphy Daniel J., Tassin Jacques, Witt Arne, Zenni Raphael D., Richardson David M.. 2011. Risk assessment, eradication, and biological control: global efforts to limit Australian acacia invasions. Diversity and Distributions, 17 (5) : 1030-1046.

Article de revue ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact
[img] Version publiée - Anglais
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
document_560843.pdf

Télécharger (339kB)

Quartile : Q1, Sujet : BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION / Quartile : Q1, Sujet : ECOLOGY

Résumé : Aim? Many Australian Acacia species have been planted around the world, some are highly valued, some are invasive, and some are both highly valued and invasive. We review global efforts to minimize the risk and limit the impact of invasions in this widely used plant group. Location? Global. Methods? Using information from literature sources, knowledge and experience of the authors, and the responses from a questionnaire sent to experts around the world, we reviewed: (1) a generalized life cycle of Australian acacias and how to control each life stage, (2) different management approaches and (3) what is required to help limit or prevent invasions. Results? Relatively few Australian acacias have been introduced in large numbers, but all species with a long and extensive history of planting have become invasive somewhere. Australian acacias, as a group, have a high risk of becoming invasive and causing significant impacts as determined by existing assessment schemes. Moreover, in most situations, long-lived seed banks mean it is very difficult to control established infestations. Control has focused almost exclusively on widespread invaders, and eradication has rarely been attempted. Classical biological control is being used in South Africa with increasing success. Main conclusions? A greater emphasis on pro-active rather than reactive management is required given the difficulties managing established invasions of Australian acacias. Adverse effects of proposed new introductions can be minimized by conducting detailed risk assessments in advance, planning for on-going monitoring and management, and ensuring resources are in place for long-term mitigation. Benign alternatives (e.g. sterile hybrids) could be developed to replace existing utilized taxa. Eradication should be set as a management goal more often to reduce the invasion debt. Introducing classical biological control agents that have a successful track-record in South Africa to other regions and identifying new agents (notably vegetative feeders) can help mitigate existing widespread invasions. Trans-boundary sharing of information will assist efforts to limit future invasions, in particular, management strategies need to be better evaluated, monitored, published and publicised so that global best-practice procedures can be developed.

Mots-clés Agrovoc : Acacia, mauvaise herbe vivace, espèce envahissante, introduction de plantes, désherbage, lutte biologique

Mots-clés géographiques Agrovoc : Australie, Afrique du Sud

Classification Agris : H60 - Mauvaises herbes et désherbage
F40 - Écologie végétale
F70 - Taxonomie végétale et phytogéographie

Champ stratégique Cirad : Axe 1 (2005-2013) - Intensification écologique

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Wilson John R. U., SANBI (ZAF)
  • Gairifo Claire, Stellenbosch University (ZAF)
  • Gibson Michelle R., Stellenbosch University (ZAF)
  • Arianoutsou Margarita, University of Athens (GRC)
  • Bakar Baki B., University of Malaya (MYS)
  • Baret Stéphane, Parc national de la Réunion (REU)
  • Celesti-Grapow Laura, Universita di Roma La Sapienza (ITA)
  • DiTomaso Joseph M., UC (USA)
  • Dufour-Dror Jean-Marc, JIIS (ISR)
  • Kueffer Christophe, ETH (CHE)
  • Kull Christian A., Monash University (AUS)
  • Hoffmann John H., UCT (ZAF)
  • Impson Fiona A. C., UCT (ZAF)
  • Loope Lloyd L., US Geological Survey (USA)
  • Marchante Elizabete, University of Coimbra (PRT)
  • Marchante Hélia, ESAC (PRT)
  • Moore Joslin L., University of Melbourne (AUS)
  • Murphy Daniel J., Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne (AUS)
  • Tassin Jacques, CIRAD-ES-UPR BSef (FRA)
  • Witt Arne, CABI (KEN)
  • Zenni Raphael D., University of Tennessee (USA)
  • Richardson David M., Stellenbosch University (ZAF)

Source : Cirad - Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/560843/)

Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop) Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2024-03-29 ]