Agritrop
Accueil

The role of interactive agent-based simulation modeling platforms for tradeoff analysis in participatory approaches for integrated water resources management

Le Page Christophe, Kizito Fred, Venot Jean-Philippe, Daré William's. 2014. The role of interactive agent-based simulation modeling platforms for tradeoff analysis in participatory approaches for integrated water resources management. In : Resilience and development: mobilising for transformation. Villeurbanne : Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe, Résumé, 213. Resilience Alliance 2014, Montpellier, France, 4 Mai 2014/8 Mai 2014.

Communication avec actes
[img] Version publiée - Anglais
Accès réservé aux agents Cirad
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
document_574914.pdf

Télécharger (11kB)

Résumé : A participatory modeling approach involving multiple stakeholders was conducted for a watershed located in the Upper East Region of Ghana. The profile of stakeholders included farmers, district assembly and regional officials as well as national policy makers. Three sets of participatory modeling workshops were organized in October 2011, June 2012 and May 2013. The interactive agent-based simulation model, developed with the Cormas generic platform, was introduced during the second set of participatory modeling workshops, as a tool to "replay" the role-playing game sessions to support discussions about plausible land use changes. Land cover in this region was broadly categorized into 4 clusters: intensive cropping, forest, mixed vegetation (crop and trees) and natural vegetation. Four scenarios were developed to explore the impact of land use changes on food security and environmental integrity using a 15-year timeframe. The scenarios were business as usual (BAU) (scenario 0), reduced cropland replaced by forest and mixed vegetation along riparian areas (scenario 1), planted trees and vegetation along riparian areas with forest replacing mixed vegetation (scenario2), increased cropland in the entire landscape (scenario 3). In the event of extreme climatic shocks such as flooding, food production decreased under scenarios 1 and 2 with more prominent declines observed for scenario 2 yet scenario 3 depicted only marginal decreases from the BAU scenario and further increased in years 13 to 15. The environmental index for scenario 1 showed minimal increases from the BAU scenario and scenario 3 showed a steady increment in the environmental index. Interestingly, for scenario 2, though it showed minimal benefit for food production, it posted a steady exponential increase in the environmental index throughout the simulation cycle. These dynamics indicate the inherent tradeoffs that are characteristic of complex landscapes in which poor farmers have to make a choice for their survival and livelihood, the key question this study helps to address is how this can be achieved with a lower environmental footprint. (Texte integral)

Classification Agris : P10 - Ressources en eau et leur gestion
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
U30 - Méthodes de recherche

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Le Page Christophe, CIRAD-ES-UPR GREEN (FRA) ORCID: 0000-0002-1920-0091
  • Kizito Fred, CIAT (KEN)
  • Venot Jean-Philippe, Wageningen University (NLD)
  • Daré William's, CIRAD-ES-UPR GREEN (BFA)

Source : Cirad - Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/574914/)

Voir la notice (accès réservé à la Dist) Voir la notice (accès réservé à la Dist)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2019-10-03 ]