Agritrop
Home

What is wrong with the self-targeting of food aid?

Galtier Franck. 2019. What is wrong with the self-targeting of food aid?. . Bordeaux : SFER, pp. 1-18. Journées de recherche en sciences sociales (JRSS 2019). 13, Bordeaux, France, 12 December 2019/13 December 2019.

Paper without proceedings
[img]
Preview
Published version - Anglais
Use under authorization by the author or CIRAD.
F34_Galtier.pdf

Télécharger (381kB) | Preview

Abstract : Self-targeting (ST) is a method used to allocate social transfers to specific households. Its principle is very simple: transfers are proposed to all households in the community, but conditions are created to discourage households that are not in need from asking for them. Three modalities are used: low-quality food is distributed; queues are created intentionally when distributing food or cash; or a matching contribution in the form of work is required. Experts are usually enthusiastic about ST because it is proving to be much more cost-effective than classical targeting methods (T). However, some experts share the feeling that “there is something wrong with ST”. This article provides the first systematic analysis of the ethical issues raised by ST. It assesses ST under a wide spectrum of ethics approaches (consequentialist and non-consequentialist ; objectivist and subjectivist), the counterfactuals being “no transfers” and “transfers targeted trough T”. It appears that ST raises huge ethical issues. The potential implications for policies are far-reaching, since self-targeting is widely and increasingly used to channel emergency food aid and other social transfers.

Mots-clés libres : Social transfers, Food aid, Targeting, Self-targeting, Ethics

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Galtier Franck, CIRAD-ES-UMR MOISA (FRA)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/595108/)

View Item (staff only) View Item (staff only)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2020-07-17 ]