Agritrop
Accueil

A critical comparison of conventional, certified, and community management of tropical forests for timber in terms of environmental, economic, and social variables

Burivalova Zuzana, Hua Fangyuan, Koh Lian Pin, Garcia Claude, Putz Francis E.. 2017. A critical comparison of conventional, certified, and community management of tropical forests for timber in terms of environmental, economic, and social variables. Conservation Letters, 10 (1) : 4-14.

Article de revue ; Article de revue à facteur d'impact
[img]
Prévisualisation
Version publiée - Anglais
Utilisation soumise à autorisation de l'auteur ou du Cirad.
Burivalova_et_al-2017-Conservation_Letters.pdf

Télécharger (515kB) | Prévisualisation

Quartile : Outlier, Sujet : BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION

Résumé : Tropical forests are crucial in terms of biodiversity and ecosystem services, but at the same time, they are major sources of revenue and provide livelihoods for forest-dependent people. Hopes for the simultaneous achievement of conservation goals and poverty alleviation are therefore increasingly placed on forests used for timber extraction. Most timber exploitation is carried out unsustainably, which causes forest degradation. Two important mechanisms have emerged to promote sustainable forest management: certification and community-based forest management (CFM). We synthesize the published information about how forest certification and CFM perform in terms of environmental, social, and economic variables. With the caveat that very few published studies meet the standards for formal impact evaluation, we found that certification has substantial environmental benefits, typically achieved at a cost of reduced short-term financial profit, and accompanied by some improvement to the welfare of neighboring communities. We found that the economic and environmental benefits of CFM are understudied, but that the social impacts are controversial, with both positive and negative changes reported. We identify the trade-offs that likely caused these conflicting results and that, if addressed, would help both CFM and certification deliver the hoped-for benefits.

Mots-clés Agrovoc : forêt, forêt tropicale, biodiversité, aménagement forestier, gestion des ressources naturelles, approche participative, approches communautaires, communauté rurale, certification des forêts, participation communautaire, décentralisation, moyens d'existence durables, revenu complémentaire, impact sur l'environnement, développement durable, législation de l'environnement, économie forestière, abattage d'arbres, déboisement, protection de la forêt, exploitation forestière

Mots-clés géographiques Agrovoc : Afrique, Asie, Amérique latine

Classification Agris : K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
K70 - Dégâts causés aux forêts et leur protection
E50 - Sociologie rurale

Champ stratégique Cirad : Axe 6 (2014-2018) - Sociétés, natures et territoires

Auteurs et affiliations

  • Burivalova Zuzana, Princeton University (USA)
  • Hua Fangyuan, Princeton University (USA)
  • Koh Lian Pin, University of Adelaide (AUS)
  • Garcia Claude, CIRAD-ES-UPR BSef (CHE) ORCID: 0000-0002-7351-0226
  • Putz Francis E., University of Florida (USA)

Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/583517/)

Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop) Voir la notice (accès réservé à Agritrop)

[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2024-07-17 ]