Barrett Jaime R., Innes Gabriel K., Johnson Kelly A., Lhermie Guillaume, Ivanek Renata, Greiner Safi Amelia, Lansing David. 2021. Consumer perceptions of antimicrobial use in animal husbandry: A scoping review. PloS One, 16 (12):e0261010, 21 p.
![]()
|
Version publiée
- Anglais
Sous licence ![]() 614305.pdf Télécharger (1MB) | Prévisualisation |
|
![]()
|
Version publiée
- Anglais
Sous licence ![]() journal.pone.0270442.pdf Télécharger (194kB) | Prévisualisation |
Url - jeu de données - Entrepôt autre : https://osf.io/b5cdq/
Quartile : Q2, Sujet : MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Liste HCERES des revues (en SHS) : oui
Thème(s) HCERES des revues (en SHS) : Psychologie-éthologie-ergonomie; Staps
Note générale : Barrett JR, Innes GK, Johnson KA, Lhermie G, Ivanek R, Greiner Safi A, et al. (2022) Correction: Consumer perceptions of antimicrobial use in animal husbandry: A scoping review. PLoS ONE 17(6): e0270442. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270442
Résumé : Antimicrobial use in animal agriculture is often perceived to play a role in the emerging threat of antimicrobial resistance. Increased consumer awareness of this issue places pressure on animal husbandry to adopt policies to reduce or eliminate antimicrobial use. We use a scoping review methodology to assess research on consumer perceptions of antimicrobial drugs in meat products in the United States, Canada, or the European Union. Evaluating peer-reviewed and grey literature, we included studies for assessment if they met these topical and geographic requirements, involved primary data collection, and were originally published in English. Our screening process identified 124 relevant studies. Three reviewers jointly developed a data charting form and independently charted the contents of the studies. Of the 105 studies that measured consumer concern, 77.1% found that consumers were concerned about antimicrobial use in meat production. A minority of studies (29.8% of all studies) queried why consumers hold these views. These studies found human health and animal welfare were the main reasons for concern. Antimicrobial resistance rarely registered as an explicit reason for concern. A smaller group of studies (23.3%) measured the personal characteristics of consumers that expressed concern about antimicrobials. Among these studies, the most common and consistent features of these consumers were gender, age, income, and education. Regarding the methodology used, studies tended to be dominated by either willingness-to-pay studies or Likert scale questionnaires (73.64% of all studies). We recommend consideration of qualitative research into consumer views on this topic, which may provide new perspectives that explain consumer decision-making and mentality that are lacking in the literature. In addition, more research into the difference between what consumers claim is of concern and their ultimate purchasing decisions would be especially valuable.
Mots-clés Agrovoc : élevage, production animale, résistance aux antimicrobiens, antimicrobien, antibiotique, santé animale, Résistance aux antibiotiques
Agences de financement hors UE : U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Auteurs et affiliations
- Barrett Jaime R., University of Maryland (USA)
- Innes Gabriel K., Rutgers University (USA)
- Johnson Kelly A., Cornell University (USA)
- Lhermie Guillaume, CIRAD-BIOS-UMR ASTRE (FRA)
- Ivanek Renata, Cornell University (USA)
- Greiner Safi Amelia, Cornell University (USA)
- Lansing David, University of Maryland (USA) - auteur correspondant
Source : Cirad-Agritrop (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/614305/)
[ Page générée et mise en cache le 2025-09-09 ]